Legal Opinion
Benson Tower Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Victaulic Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 27, 2014No. Case No. 3:13-cv-01010-SIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Benson Tower Condominium Owners Association (“Plaintiff’ or “Association”), brings this action against Defendant, Victaulic Company (“Defendant” or “Victaulic”), as the manufacturer of allegedly defective plumbing products installed in the Benson Tower Condominium. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (Dkt. 52) alleges the following six claims: (1) strict products liability; (2) negligence; (3) breach of express warranty; (4) violation of Oregon’s Unlawful Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”); (5) fraud; and (6) negligent…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Unigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Blurton v. Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
- Santoro v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Unigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- Washington Election Integrity Coalition United v. FellDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022