Legal Opinion

Bander v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1943PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiff was employed as an insurance agent at the Somerville office of the defendant and was a policyholder in the defendant. On February 9, 1939, in response to a subpoena, he appeared and testified under oath before a committee of the Congress of the United States at Washington, D. C. In reply to questions there put to him he made, in substance, these statements: In elections of directors held by the defendant it has been a general practice in the Somerville office for agents to sign ballots for policyholders without their consent. The witness “would say” he had engaged in that…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Prins v. Holland-North America Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Berry v. City of New York Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Comerford v. MeierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Noonan v. Staples, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Bratt v. International Business MacHines Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Hartmann v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Ravnikar v. BogojavlenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API