State Ex Rel. Weary v. State
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
12 So.3d 968 (2009)
STATE ex rel. Michael WEARY
v.
STATE of Louisiana.
No. 2008-KP-2673.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
June 26, 2009.
PER CURIAM.[1]
Granted. This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. In accord with the criteria and procedures set forth in La.S.Ct. Rule 17, § 13, the district court is directed to enroll Edward Q. Cassiday, of the firm of Fredrikson & Byron, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as co-counsel of record pro hac vice associated with the Capital Post-Conviction Project of Louisiana to represent relator, Michael Weary, in post-conviction proceedings. The…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Knoll; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Weimer; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Weimer.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Murray v. GiarratanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.