Legal Opinion
Montro Corp. v. Prindle
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1952PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
105 F.Supp. 460 (1952)
MONTRO CORP.
v.
PRINDLE et al.
United States District Court, S. D. New York.
May 28, 1952.
Abraham K. Weber, New York City, for plaintiff.
Hughes, Hubbard, Blair & Reed, New York City (Richard W. Hogue, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for defendant, Devoe & Reynolds Co., Inc.
Wickes, Riddell, Bloomer, Jacobi & McGuire, New York City (Harold F. McGuire, New York City, of counsel), for other defendants.
MURPHY, District Judge.
These are motions by defendants in a shareholder's derivative suit between plaintiff, a New Jersey corporation, and defendants, a New York corporation and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Davenport v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Mottolese v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Glicken v. BradfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Beury v. BeuryDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1954
- H. Gabriel Murphy v. Washington American League Base Ball Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Smith v. SperlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.