Legal Opinion
Glicken v. Bradford
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 17, 1962PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
Defendants Alleghany Corporation, Investors Diversified Services, Inc. and Investors Stock Fund, Inc. seek relief on this motion based on various grounds. First, that the action be transferred to the District Court of Minnesota for the convenience of witnesses and the parties (28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)), or, in the alternative, that the action be dismissed under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Second, that service on Investors Stock Fund, Inc. be quashed. Third, that if such service is quashed the action be dismissed against Alleghany Corporation and Investors…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pedro Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Company, Maria Cristina Vento Jaime v. Pan American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Miller v. SteinbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Glicken v. BradfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Farmanfarmaian v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.