Legal Opinion
Margarita Garcia-Ramirez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 26, 2005No. 02-73546PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurrence by Judge FISHER; Concurrence by Judge GOULD.
2Per curiam
Petitioner Margarita Garcia-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), affirming without opinion an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal because of her failure to establish 10 years of continuous physical presence in the United States. Garcia-Ramirez asserts that the BIA and IJ im-permissibly applied the continuous presence requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(2) (the “90/180-day rule”)1 retroactively to *937find her…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Anant Ram Sangeeta Ram Nazra Bibi Ram v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by67 opinions
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Jose J. Padilla-Padilla Guadalupe D. Padilla-Enriquez Adela Enriquez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Joaquin Sinotes-Cruz v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Mejia v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Jacqueline Canales-Vargas v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.