Legal Opinion

Mejia v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2007No. 04-74001, 04-76214PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

In late 2002, the Attorney General promulgated a rule designed to guide Immigration Judges (“IJs”) in deciding whether to grant waivers of inadmissibility to the United States based on certain criminal grounds. The regulation provides that in cases where individuals have committed “violent or dangerous crimes,” the Attorney General will not exercise his discretion to grant waivers under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) (known as § 212(h) relief) unless the individual can show “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship.” 8 C.F.R. § 212.7(d).

In this appeal we consider, among other…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Maricela M. Fernandez, Danelia Fernandez Covarrubias v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Ansberto Gonzalez v. Kenneth Cuccinelli, IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  2. Francisco Garfias-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Lakhwinder Latter-Singh v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Durable Manufacturing Co. v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. John Waldron v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API