Legal Opinion

People v. Lopez

California Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1998No. S064118PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In this case we consider whether the trial court, in instructing the jury on the elements of the charged felony offense of committing a lewd act upon a child under the age of 14 (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a)),1 erred in failing also to instruct, on its own motion, regarding the misdemeanor offense of child annoyance (§ 647.6, subd. (a)). We conclude, consistent with the Court of Appeal decision below, that child annoyance is not a lesser included offense requiring sua sponte instructions. As we explain, the lesser offense of child annoyance requires commission of an objectively…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. MoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. United States v. Rafael Baron-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API