Legal Opinion

United States v. Hart

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2011No. 09-6554PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

William Hart, II was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) of attempting to persuade a minor to engage in unlawful sexual activity, and under 18 U.S.C. § 2251 of attempting to persuade a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing visual depictions. These convictions were based on internet conversations that took place between Hart and an undercover detective posing as a 14-year-old girl. The district court sentenced Hart to concurrent mandatory-minimum sentences of 120 months of imprisonment for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. FeltsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. ReingoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Michael ThoranCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. SchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  5. Altin Shuti v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API