Munns v. Precision Franchising, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Where the Commission failed to make adequate findings of fact regarding the suitability of the employment, the case is remanded to the Commission for additional findings.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
On 24 July 2004, Darrell Munns (“employee”) was employed as a service technician at Precision Tune Auto Care (“employer”). On that date, employee sustained a compensable injury when a vehicle rolled over his left leg and foot. Employer accepted liability for employee’s injury by filing a Form 60 on 6 August 2004, and employee received temporary total disability payments…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Shah v. Howard JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Ramsey v. Southern Industrial Constructors Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Dixon v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patillo v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- McLeod v. North Carolina Industrial Commission Walmart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Nobles v. Coastal Power & Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Curtis v. Gaines Motor Lines, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
- Lockard v. Chapel Hill Rehabilitation CenterNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.