Legal Opinion

Lockard v. Chapel Hill Rehabilitation Center

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided March 26, 2010No. I.C. NO. 785930Published

1Opinion of the Court

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Donovan and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties. The Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Donovan with minor modifications and enters the following Opinion and Award.

The Full Commission finds as a fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties as:

STIPULATIONS

1. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seagraves v. Austin Co. of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Demery v. Perdue Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Smith v. Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Jenkins v. Easco AluminumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Munns v. Precision Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API