Legal Opinion

Dixon v. City of Durham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1998No. COA96-1180PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

“The findings of the Industrial Commission are conclusive on appeal when supported by competent evidence even though there be evidence to support a contrary finding. However, the Commission’s legal conclusions are reviewable by the appellate courts.” Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co., 305 N.C. 593, 595, 290 S.E.2d 682, 684 (1982) (citations omitted).

When an injured employee seeks compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Act, she must show that she was incapable after her injury of earning the same wages she had earned before the injury. Id., 290 S.E.2d at 683. She may meet…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Saums v. Raleigh Community HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. McLean v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Foster v. U.S. Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Munns v. Precision Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Clark v. City of Winston-SalemNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003
  4. Curtis v. Gaines Motor Lines, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
  5. Faile v. General Tire Rubber Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API