Legal Opinion

Bellotti v. Spaeder

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1969No. Appeal, 211PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mk. Justice Eagen,

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident. The original defendant moved for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. From the denial of this motion, the present appeal was filed. It must be quashed.

An order denying a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is interlocutory and is not appealable. McGee v. Singley, 382 Pa. 18, 114 A. 2d 141 (1955), and Vendetti v. Schuster, 1 418 Pa. 68, 208 A. 2d 864 (1965). But it is asserted that a question…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Echon v. Pennsylyania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. McGee v. SINGLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Ross v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Goldstein v. StadlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Vendetti v. SchusterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bartanus v. LisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Standard Pipeline Coating Co. v. Solomon & Teslovich, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. DeMatteo v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Dash v. Wilap Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Sykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API