Legal Opinion

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Mercer

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1933No. 11134PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Justice.

In a suit by appellee, E. F. Mercer, for damages alleged to have resulted to his business as a dairyman and truck gardener, because of the unlawful blocking of a public highway by appellants, the Texas & Pacific Railway Company and Gifford-Hill & Co., a construction corporation, appellee was awarded the sum of $5,000, and appellants have perfected their appeal to this court. The necessary facts are:

Appellee owns a tract of land located some five or six miles northeast of the city of Sherman, on which for several years he had conducted a dairy and a truck farm. He had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robertson & Mueller v. HoldenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Greer v. ThamanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Kaufman & Runge v. ArmstrongTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Miller & English v. Jannett & FrankeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Spies v. ProvineTexas Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Taormina v. CulicchiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Boise Street Car Co. v. Van AveryIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Ferguson Seed Farms, Inc. v. Fort Worth & D., S. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. MercerTexas Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API