Legal Opinion

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Mercer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1936No. Motion No. 12375; No. 6513PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRITZ, Justice.

It appears from the record in this case that The Texas & Pacific Railway Company and E. F. Mercer were both dissatisfied with the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals [58 S.W.(2d) 896] in this cause, and each filed an application for writ of error to this court. Both applications were granted.

It further appears that E. F. Mercer duly filed a writ of error bond, which bond contained the following condition:

“Now, therefore, we E. F. Mercer, plaintiff in error, as principal, and A. S. Noble and A. E. Jamison, as sureties, acknowledge ourselves to pay to the Texas & Pacific…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. SaxonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Succession of ConwaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. City of Dublin v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Henwood v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API