Legal Opinion
Ferguson Seed Farms, Inc. v. Fort Worth & D., S. P. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 26, 1934No. 4172PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAUL, Chief Justice.
The appellant company filed this suit against the appellee railway company to recover $40,000 alleged to be the damages resulting to the appellant by reason oí the wrongful act of the railway company in constructing two tracts of railway, variously called switch tracks, spur tracks, and industrial tracks along Grove street in the city of Plainview, upon which street the appellant’s gin property was situated.
It is alleged that in June, 1928, appellee constructed one of the tracks along the west side of - Grove street immediately west of appellant’s gin. That no condemnation…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
- Robertson & Mueller v. HoldenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. GarrisonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Roaring Springs Townsite Co. v. Paducah Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
- City of Noblesville v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harris v. Thornton's Department StoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- City of Sierra Vista v. Cochise Enters., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Texas Public Utilities Corp. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- City of Camdenton v. Sho-Me Power Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Ferguson Seed Farms, Inc. v. Fort Worth & D.-S. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.