Spies v. Provine
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. B. K. Boykin, Special District Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
HOBBY, Judge.
—Appellants brought this suit by attachment against the appellee Provine to recover a debt amounting to $2032.40. That the debt was due was admitted. But appellee pleaded in reconvention actual and exemplary damages resulting to him from the levy of the attachment. A trial was had in November, 1888, and a verdict was rendered in favor of appellants for the debt and for appellee for the sum of $2500 actual and $1200 exemplary damages.
The first question presented is whether there can be a recovery by a defendant alone in attachment for damages resulting from the issuance of *355the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kaufman & Runge v. ArmstrongTexas Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hamlett v. CoatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Southwest Bank & Trust Co. v. Executive Sportsman Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Slaughter v. American Baptist Publication SocietyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Sullivan v. NicoulinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of Dallas v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.