Legal Opinion

In Re Tsuji Horiuchi

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1930No. Docket No. 202PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMES, J., pro tem.

The petitioners, fourteen in number, were indicted by the grand jury of the county of Imperial for the crime of criminal syndicalism, as defined by an act of the legislature known as the “Criminal Syndicalism Act,” approved April 30, 1919 (Stats. 1919, p. 281). Upon their arraignment the Superior Court fixed their bail at fifteen thousand dollars each. They thereupon sued out a writ of habeas corpus from this court, and the sole question to be determined is whether or not the amount of bail fixed by the Superior Court is excessive.

It is well settled by the decisions in this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Ex parte DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Ex Parte RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Ex parte RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. In re WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. In Re MoreheadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
  4. United States v. SpectorDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
  5. In re BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API