Legal Opinion

United States v. Schneiderman

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 28, 1951No. 21888, 21940PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

The defendants in these two cases are under indictment charged with conspiracy “to commit offenses against the United States” prohibited by Section 2 of the Smith Act, 54 Stat. 671 (1940), 18 U.S.C. (1946 ed.) § 10, and 18 U.S.C. (1948 ed.) § 2385, “by so conspiring * * * to advocate and teach the duty and necessity of overthrowing the Government of the United States by force and violence, and * * * to organize and help organize as the 'Communist Party of the United States of America a * * * group * * * of persons who teach and advocate the overthrow and destruction of…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. Bert Croft, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  3. Willie Ray Harrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. De Veau v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. First National Bank of Worland v. Financial Institutions BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API