Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ruef

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1908No. Crim. No. 136PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPLICATION for reduction of bail upon habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Frank J. Murphy, Henry Ach, and M. C. Chapman, for Petitioner.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

The petitioner, Abraham Ruef, asks the court to admit him to bail upon divers indictments now pending against him in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco. Bail has been fixed upon each charge by order of the superior court, so that the proceeding before us is in effect an application for a reduction of the bail heretofore fixed by the court in which the indictments are pending.

There are now pending one hundred and sixteen indictments against petitioner, in each of which he is charged with bribing a member of the board of supervisors of the city and county of San…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Ex parte DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Ex parte RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. In re WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re HumphreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  2. People v. GilliamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. UntreinerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. In Re Tsuji HoriuchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. People v. EisemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API