Legal Opinion

In re Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1889No. 20631PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

The return to the writ in this case shows that the petitioner is held on a bench-warrant regularly issued out of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, upon an indictment found by the grand jury, charging him with the crime of forgery, a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not less than one nor more than fourteen years, and upon which warrant an order has been regularly indorsed, admitting the prisoner to bail in the sum of eight thousand dollars. The application is in form to be admitted to bail, but upon the hearing the party asks for a reduction of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Ex parte DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Ex parte RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. In Re Tsuji HoriuchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. State ex rel. ChandlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  4. Ex parte CollazoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
  5. In re BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API