Legal Opinion

United States v. Intrados/International Management Group

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 2, 2002No. Civil Action No.: 01-0769 (RMU)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

I. INTRODUCTION

This action involves our nation’s privatization of foreign commerce markets. The United States of America (“the plaintiff’ or “the government”) brings suit under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), as amended, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., and under the common-law theories of payment-by-mistake, unjust enrichment, and fraud. The defen dants have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) for failure to plead fraud with particularity…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Head v. Kane Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. US Ex Rel. Harris v. BernadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. In re Cardiac Devices Qui Tam LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  4. United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. United States v. Science Applications International Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API