Legal Opinion

Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. Jacks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1936No. 6 Div. 764PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The suit is on a policy of insurance, issued in lieu of a bond, under and pursuant to the Alabama Motor Carrier Act of 1931, General Acts 1931, p. 303, and p. 312, § 13.

On October 7, 1932, plaintiff, Nicholas W. Jacks, received personal injuries resulting from a collision of the vehicle in which he was riding with a truck owned and operated by Baggett & Skaggs Truck Lines, Inc.

This was a motor transportation company, operating a truck line over the public highways as a common carrier of freight, between Birmingham and Memphis, subject to the Alabama Motor-Carrier Act of 1931,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. John R. Davis Lumber Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Pomerantz v. Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Limestone County v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. American Book Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Young & Vann Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Lopez v. TownsendNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  4. McWhorter Transfer Co. v. PeekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Harbin v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API