Dekalb National Bank v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Swift county to recover $600 on a promissory note. The case was tried before Qvale, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of defendants. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action upon a promissory note. The answer was, in effect, that the note was obtained by fraud, and was without consideration. Verdict for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
*152For the purposes of the trial only, it was admitted that the note was without consideration, and was obtained by fraud, as alleged in the answer. The plaintiff, however, claimed that it was a bona fide purchaser of the note, in the usual course of business, before its maturity, for a valuable consideration. This claim was the only issue submitted to the jury, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merchants' Exchange Bank v. LuckowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Bank of Montreal v. RichterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Barber v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- White v. CulverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Fredin v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- First National Bank v. McNairySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- McWethy v. NorbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Pearson v. LaffertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.