Fredin v. Richards
Supreme Court of Minnesota
.Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Moer, J., denying a motion to set aside a verdict’ for $2,451, in favor of plaintiffs, and for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The allegations of the first count or cause of action of the plaintiffs’ complaint, so far as here material, are substantially *491as follows: That P. L. Peterson on June 15, 1891, applied to the-defendants for a loan of $4,000, which they made to him, and, in consideration therefor, received from him his promissory note, dated on that day, for that sum, due six months after date, payable-to Bear Valley Bank, or order, with interest at the rate of 8 percent. per annum. That, as a condition of making such loan, the defendants required a guaranty of payment of the note to be executed by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grimes v. BryneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1858
- Scott v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- White v. CulverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- First National Bank v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liebelt v. CarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fredin v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Dekalb National Bank v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Slater v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Robinson v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.