Legal Opinion

Patricia Hood v. Gilster-Mary Lee Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 1, 2015No. 15-1458PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Circuit Judge.

On December 23, 2013, former and current employees filed a class action lawsuit in state court against Gilster-Mary Lee Corporation and six other defendants. ■The employees allege lung impairment (or potential lung impairment) from exposure to butter-flavoring products, including diacetyl, used in Gilster’s microwave popcorn packaging plant in Jasper, Missouri. Defendants removed the case to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441(a)-(b), 1453. The parties do not dispute CAFA jurisdiction. Six weeks later, the employees dismissed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jose Mondragon v. Capital One Auto FinanceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Westerfeld v. Independent Processing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Charlotte Phillips v. Wellpoint IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. In Re Sprint Nextel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. McMorris v. TJX Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hargett v. Revclaims, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. Tiffany Davenport v. Lockwood, Andrews & NewnamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. SEECO, Inc. v. SnowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Ellis v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-cv-14424District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API