Hargett v. Revclaims, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) broadened federal jurisdiction over class actions but excepted controversies that are primarily local in nature. District courts must decline to exercise jurisdiction over these matters. Congress has defined the features of a local controversy. As relevant to this appeal, a class action is a local controversy if local citizens predominate over non-locals in the class membership — that is, if more than two-thirds of the class members are “citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed.” 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jose Mondragon v. Capital One Auto FinanceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Gary Reece v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Westerfeld v. Independent Processing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Jennifer Mason v. Lockwood, Andrews & NewnamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Broadway Grill, Inc. v. Visa Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Robert Leflar v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- John Kitchin v. Bridgeton LandfillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Speed v. JMA Energy Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Broadway Grill, Inc. v. Visa Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.