State v. Neville
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
The sole issue on this appeal by defendant of his judgment of conviction of possession of LSD with intent to distribute and simple possession of cocaine is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress, which was based on a claim that the police, who discovered the drugs in a search incident to a warrantless arrest of defendant, arrested defendant without probable cause. We hold that the officers did have probable cause to arrest defendant and therefore we uphold the de nial of the suppression motion and affirm defendant’s convictions.
On January 30,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. SiegfriedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. BuchwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. HunnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983