Legal Opinion
E. K. Wood Lumber Co. v. Andersen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1936No. 7791PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
The appellee has moved that the bill of exceptions be stricken, for the reason that it was not authenticated within the time provided by law or by the rules of the court below or within the term of court at which the trial was had. The bill of exceptions is also attacked as not showing that it contains all the evidence.
For a proper discussion of these preliminary questions, a chronological statement of some of the proceedings below is necessary.
The judgment was entered on December 5, 1934. In .the absence of valid extensions, it is conceded that the term of court ended…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Gunnison County Commissioners v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Crowe v. TrickeySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- State v. BuchananNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Charles E. Toliver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- William Ernest Sadler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.