Legal Opinion

Travelers' Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Randolph

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1897No. 439PublishedCited by 55 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Gourt of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee.

1Opinion of the Court

HARLAN, Circuit Justice.

This is an action upon insurance contracts evidenced by an annual policy and two accident tickets issued to Albert G. Mitchell by the Travelers’ Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn. There were a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

By its policy of June 5, 1894, that company insured Mitchell, a bookkeeper by occupation, in tlie sum of $50 per week, against loss of time, not exceeding 26 consecutive weeks, resulting from bodily injuries effected through external, violent, and accidental means, which should, independently of all other causes, immediately and wholly…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  2. Felton v. SpiroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  3. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Weyerhaeuser Company v. Bucon Construction Company, Inc., and Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Minahan v. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  5. Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API