Legal Opinion

The Sill Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 27, 1965No. 7607_1PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

The Sill Corporation, owner-sponsor of a Wherry housing project (See 63 Stat. 570, 12 U.S.C. § 1748 et seq.) appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict awarding it “just compensation” for the taking of its interest in the project. The Owner’s interest was taken pursuant to the amended provisions of the Capehart Act [See 70 Stat. 1111, 42 U.S.C. (1952 ed., Supp. V), § 1594(b)], whereunder the Secretary of Defense was directed to acquire all Wherry projects where Cape-hart housing had been approved and constructed. 1 -Under the Wherry Act, the Federal Housing Authority (FHA)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Downie v. PowersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Snowbank Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  2. Minshall v. McGraw Hill Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. SowardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  4. Dugan v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Moylan v. Maries CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API