Legal Opinion
Minshall v. McGraw Hill Broadcasting Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 28, 2003No. 01-1576, 02-1049PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
David Minshall (“Minshall”) filed this suit against his former employer, McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Company (“McGraw-Hill”), alleging that McGraw-Hill unlawfully discriminated against him on the basis of age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, and Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 24-34-401 to -406. Minshall also alleged a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court granted McGraw-Hill summary judgment on the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, which Minshall does not appeal.
A…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Luis Anthony RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Sharon G. CONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a Colorado Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Phelps v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Leibowitz v. Cornell UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Racher v. Westlake Nursing Home Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Grace United Methodist Church v. City of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.