Legal Opinion

Croce v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1937No. Civ. 10445PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

—The determinative question here presented is whether an attorney who has represented several clients associated in a business enterprise, in the defense of an action involving their common interest, wherein it was denied that a copartnership existed between them, is disqualified, and the law firm of which he later became a member is also disqualified, from afterwards representing one of those former clients as plaintiff in subsequent litigation instituted against his associates, wherein it is alleged that a copartnership did exist between them. After a hearing in the superior court pursuant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wutchumna Water Co. v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Stewart v. ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Bauer v. GarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Galbraith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Harris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
  2. E. L. Cord, Etc. v. Calvin J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Zador Corp. v. KwanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Arden v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API