Croce v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
—The determinative question here presented is whether an attorney who has represented several clients associated in a business enterprise, in the defense of an action involving their common interest, wherein it was denied that a copartnership existed between them, is disqualified, and the law firm of which he later became a member is also disqualified, from afterwards representing one of those former clients as plaintiff in subsequent litigation instituted against his associates, wherein it is alleged that a copartnership did exist between them. After a hearing in the superior court pursuant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wutchumna Water Co. v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Stewart v. ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Bauer v. GarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Galbraith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Harris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
- E. L. Cord, Etc. v. Calvin J. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Goldstein v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Zador Corp. v. KwanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Arden v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.