Legal Opinion

Competitor Liaison Bureau of Nascar, Inc. v. Midkiff

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1957No. 744PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Plaintiff assigns as error the failure of the court to make certain requested findings of fact and conclusions of law; but these assignments are based on a misconception of the nature of the hearing. The hearing was not on evidence submitted to the court, upon waiver of jury trial in accordance with G.S. 1-184. When this procedure is adopted, a statement of the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law is appropriate. G.S. 1-185; Goldsboro v. R. R., ante, 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486. Here, the cause was submitted for decision on the facts stipulated.

Appellant assigns as error certain recitals…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. MacHine Co. v. Owings.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Davis v. HargettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Blevins v. FranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Jenkins v. TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Crowder v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. In Re the Purported Will of ShepherdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Barrino v. Radiator Specialty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Barrino v. Radiator Specialty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API