Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barrino v. Radiator Specialty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1986No. 439A84Published

1DissentJustice Martin

I respectfully dissent. The primary issue before this Court is not, as the majority contends, whether the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act provides the exclusive remedy for an employee injured by the willful, wanton, and reckless negligence of his employer. The question we must decide is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the defendant-employer in view of evidence put forth by the plaintiff which creates a genuine issue of material fact concerning defendant’s subjective intent.

Summary judgment is properly granted when the pleadings, depositions, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API