Legal Opinion

Blevins v. France

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1956No. 608PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff alleges in her complaint five acts of negligence. She alleges that the defendants were jointly, severally and concurrently negligent and careless in that they wilfully, wantonly and intentionally (1) failed to treat the unpaved portion of the track to hold down dust, and failed to provide a safe track on which said race could be run in reasonable safety, and (2) appointed an inexperienced man, well knowing him to be inexperienced, to control the race as starter. The plaintiff has offered no evidence at all to support the above two allegations as to negligence. The other three…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Bailey v. North Carolina R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Keener v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Rodgers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Bell v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API