Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Thain v. City of Palo Alto

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1969No. Civ. 25862PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.

The People of the State of California, upon the relation of Janet A. Thain, have appealed from a judgment in favor of the City of Palo Alto (City) entered in an action in quo warranto. By the action it was sought, without success, to have the annexation to the City, of property owned by the realtor and others, declared void and of no effect. The annexation proceedings were taken pursuant to Government Code sections 35300-35326 (Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939—which we shall refer to as the Annexation Act).

Appellant’s contention is that the owners of more than one-half of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Buelke v. LevenstadtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Teater v. Good Hope Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Borne Ex Rel. Borne v. Northwest Allen County School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Hennigan v. United Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Esling v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re Baby Boy T.California Court of Appeal · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API