Legal Opinion

Sanderson v. Paul

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1952No. 668PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

69 S.E.2d 156 (1952)

235 N.C. 56

SANDERSON et al.

v.

PAUL et ux.

No. 668.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 1, 1952.

McKinnon & McKinnon, Lumberton, for plaintiffs, Elsie Mae Sanderson, Zelma Bardo, and Deborah Sutton Paul.

McLean & Stacy, Lumberton, for plaintiff Lillian Paul.

Ellis E. Page, and Varser, McIntyre & Henry, all of Lumberton, for defendants, appellees.

DEVIN, Chief Justice.

The judgment of nonsuit rendered by the court below was predicated upon the ruling that Lillian Paul, party plaintiff, was disqualified by the statute G.S. § 8-51 to testify in her own interest concerning…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bunn v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Price v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Avery v. Stewart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. State v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Sprinkle v. PonderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Godwin v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Rape v. LyerlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Hardison v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Cale v. NapierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API