Legal Opinion

Rape v. Lyerly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1975No. 94PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

We consider first defendants’ contentions (1) that the evidence was insufficient to warrant a finding that Mr. Jim contracted to devise his real property as alleged by plaintiffs and (2) that the writing signed by Mr. Jim was insufficient to comply with G.S. 22-2, our statute of frauds. . .

Although an oral contract to devise land is unenforceable, Pickelsimer v. Pickelsimer, 257 N.C. 696, 698, 127 S.E. 2d 557, 559 (1962), a valid written contract to devise land is enforceable in equity. Schoolfield v. Collins, 281 N.C.- 604, 615-16, 189 S.E. 2d 208, 215 (1972).

“An…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Bunn v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Bolman v. OverallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Schoolfield v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. Head & Engquist Equipment, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Computer Decisions, Inc. v. Rouse Office Management of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. RubishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. In Re the Will of McCauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Houston v. TillmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API