Rape v. Lyerly
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
We consider first defendants’ contentions (1) that the evidence was insufficient to warrant a finding that Mr. Jim contracted to devise his real property as alleged by plaintiffs and (2) that the writing signed by Mr. Jim was insufficient to comply with G.S. 22-2, our statute of frauds. . .
Although an oral contract to devise land is unenforceable, Pickelsimer v. Pickelsimer, 257 N.C. 696, 698, 127 S.E. 2d 557, 559 (1962), a valid written contract to devise land is enforceable in equity. Schoolfield v. Collins, 281 N.C.- 604, 615-16, 189 S.E. 2d 208, 215 (1972).
“An…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Bunn v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Bolman v. OverallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Peaseley v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL AND COKE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Schoolfield v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. Head & Engquist Equipment, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Computer Decisions, Inc. v. Rouse Office Management of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. RubishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- In Re the Will of McCauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Houston v. TillmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.