Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Codd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

All of the members of the court concur that there is substantial evidence to support the respective findings and determinations of the Police Commissioner as to the petitioners Thomas and Finucane and that the respective petitions should be denied.

With respect to the petition of Austin, some reservation has been expressed. Upon reflection, we have doubt whether under the circumstances brought to our attention, through the briefs, the determination of the Police Commissioner was warranted.

A reviewing court should not accept or confirm a determination merely because it was made by an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Di Nardo v. MonaghanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Reape v. AdduciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Nigro v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Holmes v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Rozakis v. BeameAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API