Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Upjohn Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided September 30, 1980No. K78-23 CA4PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.
On November 6, 1969, plaintiff J. Scott Campbell (“Campbell”) entered into an agreement with the defendant (“Upjohn”) which, among other things, provided for the exchange of his shares of Homemakers, Inc. (“Homemakers”) for those of Upjohn. Campbell initiated this lawsuit in Connecticut Superior Court on October 31, 1975, alleging that the agreement violated section 17 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q, section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,15 U.S.C. § 78j, and the Security and Exchange Commission’s Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. §…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,655 J. Scott Campbell v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Hauptmann v. WilentzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- Rose v. Arkansas Valley Environmental & Utility AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
- Platsis v. EF Hutton & Co. Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
- Dekro v. Stern Bros. & Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.