Legal Opinion
Hauptmann v. Wilentz
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 11, 1983No. Civ. 81-3177PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACEY, District Judge.
Before the court are the motions of defendants David T. Wilentz, the State of New Jersey, the Hearst Corporation, Lewis J. Bommann, John B. Wallace, William F. Horn, Joseph A. Wolf, Clinton L. Pagano, Brendan T. Byrne, James R. Zazzali, Hugo Stockburger, and Thomas H. Sisk to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1
INTRODUCTION
This case arises out of the prosecution and execution of Bruno Richard Hauptmann for the murder of Charles A. Lindbergh, Jr., over four decades ago. Charles A. Lindbergh, Jr., the…
2Cases cited210 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- James Walker v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Southern Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- McMillian v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Center Cadillac, Inc. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.