Martino v. Baker
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER Re: Motion to Compel Surveillance Tapes
COAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this personal injury action, jurisdiction is premised on diversity. On April 23, 1998, *589plaintiff asked defendant to produce any surveillance tapes of plaintiff. Because defendant refused to produce the tapes, plaintiff verbally moved to compel their production on the same date. Counsel were asked to and did fully brief the issue as of May 26, 1998. Oral argument was May 26,1998 and a bench ruling issued. Upon review of the pleadings, and consideration of the arguments of counsel, the court finds as follows.
Pla…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fisher v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993
- Wegner v. Cliff Viessman, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
- Crist v. GoodyColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lascano v. VowellColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ford v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marchello v. Chase Manhattan Auto Finance Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Roundy v. StaleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- Lagge v. Corsica Co-OpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Joan Mernick and John Mernick v. Wanda McCutchen and HudsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Driscoll v. CastellanosDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.