Legal Opinion
Ford v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided January 9, 1995No. 5:94-CV-482-BO2PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER COMPELLING PRODUCTION
DENSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the court on Plaintiffs motion to compel the defendant to respond to inquiries concerning the existence of surveillance of the plaintiff. The defendant has filed a response in opposition to the motion and this motion is now ripe for ruling.
The defendant asserts that surveillance materials are not discoverable because they will be used solely for impeachment and they are protected by work product immunity. F.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1) allows discovery of “any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Murray Sheet Metal Company, Incorporated, and Arkwright Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Snead v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Blount v. Wake Electric Membership Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Wegner v. Cliff Viessman, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fletcher v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2000
- Martensen v. KochDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- Ward v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
- Gutshall v. New Prime, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2000
- Martino v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.