Marchello v. Chase Manhattan Auto Finance Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL
DORSEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(2), Plaintiff moves to compel Defendant John McKenna (“Defendant”) to respond to the interrogatories and requests for production dated June 17, 2003, seeking discovery of surveillance materials. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs motion [Doc. No. 40] is denied.
I. Background
This case arises from an automobile accident on February 5, 2001 on Interstate 95 in Westbrook, Connecticut. Plaintiff seeks discovery concerning any surveillance conducted by Defendants on Plaintiff concerning his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Snead v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Fisher v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ruran v. Beth El Temple of West Hartford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Klein v. AIG Trading Group Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Lamoureux v. Genesis Pharmacy Services Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- United States v. United States Currency in the Sum of Six Hundred Sixty Thousand, Two Hundred DollarsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Joan Mernick and John Mernick v. Wanda McCutchen and HudsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.