Legal Opinion

Hafiz v. Midland Loan Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 6, 1939No. 32,139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

In this tort action to recover damages for the alleged conversion of an automobile, plaintiff recovered a verdict for $389. Upon motion by defendant for a new trial, a conditional order was made denying the motion if plaintiff consented to a reduction of the verdict to $289, otherwise the motion was granted. Plaintiff consented to the reduction. Defendant appeals.

On December 16, 1936, plaintiff entered into a conditional sales contract for the purchase of a used automobile from a South St. Paul car dealer. The sale price was $629.70. The vendor agreed to allow a credit of $150…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reinkey v. Findley Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Schall v. Northland Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. NesbittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Flynn v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Marquette Appliances, Inc. v. Economy Food Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. In Re Estate of FauskeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API