Legal Opinion

People v. Hickok

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1961No. Crim. 3901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Appellant’s triple attack upon his conviction for burglary fails to establish a basis for reversal. Despite his contrary contentions, the evidence fully substantiates the judgment; the court did not improperly instruct the jury as to the identity of the stolen property, and the court properly refused a proffered instruction as to an alibi.

On August 7,1960, at about 2 o’clock in the morning, Robert Chapman, owner of a Union Oil Station at the southwest corner of an intersection in Sunnyvale heard the breaking of glass at the Shell Station located on the northwest corner of the same…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. KaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. MidkiffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. GantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. MooneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API