Legal Opinion

People v. Midkiff

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1968No. Crim. 14464PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of second degree burglary (§459, Pen. Code) and grand theft (§ 487, subd. 1, Pen. Code) ; he admitted three prior convictions of burglary. Defendant appeals from the judgment.

O’Keefe Medical Service and Eureka X-Ray Tube Company occupy the same premises at 841 South Grandview. At 7:30 a.m. on April 14, 1967, Mr. McKee, an employee of Eureka had trouble opening the lock on the side door because it had been tampered with; later certain of his tools left in order on his work bench were missing. Looking around he found some of them scattered in the O’Keefe part of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. DurenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. MulqueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. SchaferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API