Legal Opinion

Perkins v. City of Pocatello

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1968No. 10150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

The plaintiffs-respondents, policemen of the City of Pocatello, instituted this action against the City, its Council and Manager, defendants-appellants, seeking an order requiring that additional funds be paid into the City’s Policemen’s Retirement Fund. Following answer by the appellants, both parties moved for a summary judgment on the basis of pleadings and affidavits submitted by each of the parties. An “Order on Summary Judgment” was entered for the respondent policemen, and this appeal was taken by the City.

In 1947 the legislature enacted a law entitled “Policemen’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clear v. MarvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  2. McPheters v. Central Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. Layne & Bowler Pump CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Oneida v. OneidaIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Coeur d'Alene v. OchsIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Perkins v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Lloyd v. LloydIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API