Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Taft
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 11, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
Elijah D. Taft died on March 1, 1915, leaving a will and two codicils which were duly admitted to probate in this court on the twenty-eighth of the same month.
The composite effect of his testamentary dispositions, so far as here material, was a division of his residuary estate into six equal parts, one of which was given to each of his six children, Daniel H. Taft, Mary Eliza Jorgensen, Deborah Ann Yates, William C. Taft, Andrew E. Taft and Rosella Kirk, the share for the last named being erected into a trust with income payable to the beneficiary for life, and “ upon her decease,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Soper v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of WorthingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of MullonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- In re MeekerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Estate of AdrianceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of JacobsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of McKeoghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of TaftNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of WannerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.